Movie title: Our Brand is Crisis
Runtime: 103 minutes
Genre: Comedy Drama
Written By: Peter Straughan
Directed By: David Gordon Green
Year of Release: 2015
Reviewer: Olutayo Irantiola
In my summation, one of those who know how to communicate best is politicians; they use every tactic to ensure that they win at the polls. The movie, which is based on the 2002 Bolivian presidential election, tactfully depicts the various strategies usually deployed in Political Communication.
Two rival Political strategists- Jane Bodine, played by Sandra Bullock also known as “Calamity”, and Pat Candy, played by Billy Bob Thornton, were engaged from the United States to manage the political campaign of two major contenders- Pedro Castillo and Victor Rivera– they were three months into the election, and they wanted to win at all cost. Castillo stood for globalisation and was considered unapproachable, but he was down by 28 points. The work before Jane was to rebrand the person that the electorate does not like, rebrand him and sell him.
There were various uses of Public Relations tactics in the movie; these included interviews, focus groups, and other areas of marketing communications, such as new media (online awareness) and TV adverts. Interestingly, they shot the first advert, which they were not satisfied with, and they could not on the second occasion. All the strategies were employed to ensure that their client won.
As the game got fiercer, Castillo was attacked during a campaign and he slapped the person who smashed an egg on his head, his communication team wanted to issue an apology press release but she objected as she knew it was a put-up job by Candy. Eventually, Jane came up with the idea of selling the brand as Crisis. The messaging was used to attract the electorate who saw it as either a means of saving the nation from a socio-economic crisis or dying.
The campaign saw Castillo rolling up his sleeves for work rather than dressing like an elite with a suit; he gradually moved up the opinion poll. Rivera, the opponent, was defined as a rogue, inexperienced and all his activities were monitored. Eventually, the electorates saw reasons to choose Castillo over his archrival, Rivera.
A cogent lesson for a PR Specialist in the movie is that even a negative situation can be hammered upon till it turns positive before the public. In Jane’s saying, “you don’t change the man to fit the narrative, you change the narrative to fit the man.” For them, there was only one wrong- losing. They won the election at last.
However, the unfortunate side was that the fear of the electorate became a reality immediately after Castillo came into office, he engaged the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which is considered an economic-tightening organisation. Jane said, “That’s the world, that’s politics. It starts with big promises and ends with jack shit happening.”
The perception of Castillo changed, but the crisis in the community could not be averted due to his economic policies and decisions. As PR Specialists, would we continue to get involved in all sorts of tactical political communication during electioneering, even though we are inevitably getting hurt by playing this game?
The 2027 Elections are drawing near in Nigeria. What are we communicating to avoid all sorts of post-electioneering crises? Often, for financial gain, we keep communicating at the expense of our conscience. As said by Warren Beatty, “People may forget what you say, but they remember how you make them feel” in the post-election period.


Leave a Reply